Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

FAIR VALUE

v3.5.0.2
FAIR VALUE
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
3. FAIR VALUE
 
In accordance with Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC 820, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.
 
 
Level 1: Input prices quoted in an active market for identical financial assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2: Inputs other than prices quoted in Level 1, such as prices quoted for similar financial assets and liabilities in active markets, prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
 
Level 3: Input prices quoted that are significant to the fair value of the financial assets or liabilities which are not observable or supported by an active market.
 
To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
The Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 82,500 common shares in a February 2013 public offering (the “February 2013 Public Offering Warrants”). On February 20, 2014, 27,500 of the February 2013 Public Offering Warrants expired. The remaining 55,000 warrants are classified within the Level 3 hierarchy. The 494,302 August 2014 Warrants are listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “CLRBW,” however, there are certain periods where trading volume is low; therefore, they are classified within the Level 2 hierarchy.
 
As is discussed further in Note 8, on October 1, 2015, the Company issued Series A warrants to purchase an aggregate of 150,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $28.30 per share, and Series B pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 48,273 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $22.00 per share. These warrants are classified within the Level 3 hierarchy.
 
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value using the lowest level of input applicable to each financial instrument as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
February 2013 Public Offering Warrants
 
$
 
$
 
$
209,000
 
$
209,000
 
August 2014 Warrants
 
 
 
 
2,714,000
 
 
 
 
2,714,000
 
October 2015 Warrants
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,858,000
 
 
1,858,000
 
Total
 
$
 
$
2,714,000
 
$
2,067,000
 
$
4,781,000
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Legacy Warrants
 
$
 
$
999
 
$
 
$
999
 
February 2013 Public Offering Warrants
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,127,500
 
 
1,127,500
 
August 2014 Warrants
 
 
 
 
4,048,416
 
 
 
 
4,048,416
 
Total
 
$
 
$
4,049,415
 
$
1,127,500
 
$
5,176,915
 
 
In order to estimate the value of the February 2013 Public Offering Warrants considered to be derivative instruments, the Company uses a modified option-pricing model together with assumptions that consider, among other variables, the fair value of the underlying stock, risk-free interest rates, volatility, the contractual term of the warrants, future financing requirements and dividend rates. The future financing estimates are based on the Company’s estimates of anticipated cash requirements over the term of the warrants as well as the frequency of required financings based on its assessment of its historical financing trends and anticipated future events. Due to the nature of these inputs and the valuation technique utilized, these warrants are classified within the Level 3 hierarchy.
 
The following table summarizes the modified option-pricing assumptions used:
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
Volatility
 
 
87.3-90.0
%
 
100.0-115.0
%
Risk-free interest rate
 
 
0.82-1.10
%
 
1.07-2.63
%
Expected life (years)
 
 
2.14-2.89
 
 
3.14-3.89
 
Dividend
 
 
0
%
 
0
%
 
In order to estimate the value of the October 2015 Warrants considered to be derivative instruments, the Company uses a modified option-pricing model together with assumptions that consider, among other variables, the fair value of the underlying stock, risk-free interest rate, volatility, the contractual term of the warrants, future financing requirements and dividend rates. The future financing estimates are based on the Company’s estimates of anticipated cash requirements over the term of the warrants as well as the frequency of required financings based on its assessment of its historical financing trends and anticipated future events. Due to the nature of these inputs and the valuation technique utilized, these warrants are also classified within the Level 3 hierarchy.
 
The following table summarizes the modified option-pricing assumptions used:
 
 
 
Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
 
2015
 
Volatility
 
 
97.57
%
Risk-free interest rate
 
 
1.70
%
Expected life (years)
 
 
4.75
 
Dividend
 
 
0
%
 
The following table summarizes the modified option-pricing assumptions used at the issuance date:
 
 
 
October 1, 2015
 
 
 
Series A
 
 
Series B
 
Volatility
 
 
94.33
%
 
 
97.57
%
Risk-free interest rate
 
 
1.76
%
 
 
1.76
%
Expected life (years)
 
 
5.00
 
 
 
5.00
 
Dividend
 
 
0
%
 
 
0
%
 
The following table summarizes the changes in the fair market value of the Company’s warrants which are classified within the Level 3 fair value hierarchy.
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning fair value of warrants
 
$
1,127,500
 
$
3,355,000
 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with the October 2015 offering
 
 
3,272,000
 
 
 
Gain on derivatives resulting from change in fair value
 
 
(2,332,500)
 
 
(2,227,500)
 
Ending fair value of warrants
 
$
2,067,000
 
$
1,127,500
 
 
To estimate the fair value of the August 2014 Warrants, the Company calculated the weighted average closing price for the trailing 10 trading day period that ended on the balance sheet date.